• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

What is Free Evolution?

Free evolution is the notion that the natural processes that organisms go through can lead to their development over time. This includes the creation of new species and transformation of the appearance of existing ones.

Numerous examples have been offered of this, including different kinds of stickleback fish that can live in salt or fresh water, and walking stick insect varieties that favor specific host plants. These mostly reversible traits permutations are not able to explain fundamental changes to the body's basic plans.

Evolution through Natural Selection

Scientists have been fascinated by the development of all living creatures that inhabit our planet for ages. The most widely accepted explanation is that of Charles Darwin's natural selection process, an evolutionary process that occurs when better-adapted individuals survive and reproduce more effectively than those less well adapted. As time passes, the number of well-adapted individuals grows and eventually develops into an entirely new species.

Natural selection is an ongoing process and involves the interaction of 3 factors that are: reproduction, variation and inheritance. Variation is caused by mutation and sexual reproduction, both of which increase the genetic diversity within an animal species. Inheritance is the term used to describe the transmission of a person's genetic characteristics, which includes both dominant and recessive genes and their offspring. Reproduction is the generation of fertile, viable offspring which includes both sexual and asexual methods.

All of these elements must be in balance for natural selection to occur. If, for instance an allele of a dominant gene makes an organism reproduce and live longer than the recessive allele then the dominant allele becomes more prevalent in a population. If the allele confers a negative advantage to survival or reduces the fertility of the population, it will disappear. The process is self-reinforced, meaning that a species with a beneficial characteristic will survive and reproduce more than an individual with a maladaptive characteristic. The more offspring an organism can produce, the greater its fitness, which is measured by its capacity to reproduce itself and live. Individuals with favorable traits, such as longer necks in giraffes, or bright white colors in male peacocks, are more likely to be able to survive and 에볼루션 바카라 에볼루션 사이트 (Fatahal.com) create offspring, and thus will become the majority of the population in the future.

Natural selection is a factor in populations and not on individuals. This is a significant distinction from the Lamarckian evolution theory which holds that animals acquire traits due to use or lack of use. If a giraffe extends its neck in order to catch prey and the neck grows longer, then the children will inherit this characteristic. The differences in neck size between generations will continue to increase until the giraffe becomes unable to breed with other giraffes.

Evolution through Genetic Drift

Genetic drift occurs when alleles from the same gene are randomly distributed in a population. Eventually, only one will be fixed (become common enough that it can no longer be eliminated by natural selection), and the other alleles drop in frequency. In extreme cases, this leads to one allele dominance. The other alleles are eliminated, and heterozygosity falls to zero. In a small group this could lead to the complete elimination the recessive gene. This is known as the bottleneck effect. It is typical of the evolutionary process that occurs whenever the number of individuals migrate to form a population.

A phenotypic bottleneck may also occur when the survivors of a catastrophe such as an outbreak or mass hunt event are confined to a small area. The survivors will have an dominant allele, and will share the same phenotype. This may be the result of a war, earthquake, or even a plague. Regardless of the cause, the genetically distinct population that remains is susceptible to genetic drift.

Walsh Lewens and 에볼루션 코리아 게이밍 (Read fatahal.com) Ariew employ Lewens, Walsh, and Ariew use a "purely outcome-oriented" definition of drift as any deviation from expected values for variations in fitness. They cite the famous example of twins that are genetically identical and have exactly the same phenotype. However, one is struck by lightning and dies, while the other continues to reproduce.

This kind of drift could play a crucial part in the evolution of an organism. This isn't the only method of evolution. Natural selection is the primary alternative, in which mutations and 에볼루션 바카라사이트 migrations maintain phenotypic diversity within the population.

Stephens asserts that there is a major difference between treating the phenomenon of drift as a force or a cause and considering other causes of evolution such as selection, mutation and migration as forces or causes. He argues that a causal-process explanation of drift lets us separate it from other forces and that this distinction is essential. He also claims that drift has a direction, that is it tends to reduce heterozygosity. It also has a magnitude, that is determined by population size.

Evolution by Lamarckism

When high school students study biology they are often introduced to the work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829). His theory of evolution is generally known as "Lamarckism" and it states that simple organisms develop into more complex organisms via the inheritance of traits which result from an organism's natural activities usage, use and disuse. Lamarckism is typically illustrated with a picture of a giraffe extending its neck longer to reach leaves higher up in the trees. This would cause the longer necks of giraffes to be passed on to their offspring who would grow taller.

Lamarck was a French Zoologist. In his lecture to begin his course on invertebrate zoology at the Museum of Natural History in Paris on the 17th of May in 1802, he introduced a groundbreaking concept that radically challenged the previous understanding of organic transformation. According Lamarck, living organisms evolved from inanimate material by a series of gradual steps. Lamarck wasn't the first to suggest this but he was thought of as the first to give the subject a comprehensive and general explanation.

The popular narrative is that Lamarckism grew into a rival to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection, and that the two theories fought out in the 19th century. Darwinism eventually won and led to the development of what biologists now refer to as the Modern Synthesis. This theory denies that traits acquired through evolution can be inherited, and instead suggests that organisms evolve through the selective action of environmental factors, such as natural selection.

Lamarck and his contemporaries supported the notion that acquired characters could be passed down to the next generation. However, this idea was never a key element of any of their evolutionary theories. This is due to the fact that it was never scientifically validated.

It's been more than 200 years since Lamarck was born and in the age of genomics there is a vast amount of evidence to support the heritability of acquired traits. This is often referred to as "neo-Lamarckism" or, more often epigenetic inheritance. It is a version of evolution that is as valid as the more popular Neo-Darwinian theory.

Evolution by Adaptation

One of the most popular misconceptions about evolution is that it is driven by a sort of struggle for survival. In fact, this view is a misrepresentation of natural selection and ignores the other forces that drive evolution. The struggle for existence is more accurately described as a struggle to survive in a certain environment. This could include not only other organisms as well as the physical surroundings themselves.

To understand how evolution works, it is helpful to think about what adaptation is. The term "adaptation" refers to any characteristic that allows a living organism to live in its environment and reproduce. It could be a physiological structure such as fur or feathers or a behavior such as a tendency to move into shade in hot weather or coming out at night to avoid cold.

The ability of an organism to draw energy from its environment and interact with other organisms and their physical environment is essential to its survival. The organism should possess the right genes for producing offspring and to be able to access sufficient food and resources. In addition, the organism should be capable of reproducing at an optimal rate within its niche.

These factors, in conjunction with mutations and gene flow can result in changes in the proportion of different alleles in a population’s gene pool. Over time, this change in allele frequencies could result in the development of new traits and ultimately new species.

Many of the features we admire in plants and animals are adaptations. For example, lungs or gills that extract oxygen from air, fur and feathers as insulation, long legs to run away from predators, and camouflage to hide. However, a thorough understanding of adaptation requires attention to the distinction between behavioral and physiological characteristics.

Physical characteristics like large gills and thick fur are physical characteristics. Behavioral adaptations are not an exception, for instance, the tendency of animals to seek companionship or move into the shade during hot weather. Furthermore, it is important to remember that a lack of forethought is not a reason to make something an adaptation. Inability to think about the implications of a choice even if it seems to be rational, may make it unadaptive.